One thing that social anarchists don't like to discuss is what happens to money - many will advocate smashing the corporations, but when you dig deep, anarchy in practise is remarkable aligned with the modern-right's rhetoric of free market capitalism.
'Rhetoric' is an important phrase. Few really believe that the neo-conservative model of 'free markets' are in anyway free or fair for all. The models, trade agreements, and practises are designed to ensure that the existing wealthy states can exploit the emerging markets for the benefits of the companies that residue in their own borders.
Reading an article I the New Scientist (19-26 December 2015) made me think about what a truly free market would represent . Discussing the deep web they interviewee reported that their shopping bit had never been swindled. Most accept that in the absence of regulation and enforcement of rules and codes of conduct , individuals and markets will descend into opportunistic exploitation, fraud and felony.
But that was not what is happening. In the legal vacuum of the deep Internet , there seems to be little advantage in cheating and rules are not required. Perhaps it is an experiment we can finally have the courage to take in a non-virtual world .




